The Microcosmic Vision of Sankaradeva

The 15^th century in Assam is remarkable for the rise of a unique school of devotion to Krsna (Krishna) that came to be known as the eka sarana (sole-refuge) school. And in the writings of its founder as well as foremost exponent Sankaradeva (1449-1568 CE), we obtain a glimpse of a microcosmic reality that is exciting and which promises to alter our understanding of the foundational texts of Hinduism in radical new ways.

The philosophy of Sankaradeva is a very real philosophy. Here, unlike in some other philosophies, the ‘world’ or the creation is not figmental or a product of one’s imagination. The objects of the senses, as also the senses themselves, are real and products of an undifferentiated mass of material substance known as prakrti, a term which may be translated into English as ‘primal matter’ or ‘Ur-matter’. The pure personalities (purusas), due to non-devotion to God, become forgetful of their own spiritual nature, and fall into this prakrti and become dead and extremely matter-like (jada). God,  who is the supreme purusa, out of His own grace (krpa), then has to rescue the fallen purusas by actuating primal matter to evolve out of itself a microcosm—a body, a psycho-physical frame, equipped with all the necessary senses and organs—which will enable the purusa (now known as jiva or organism) to re-train his consciousness. It is this story of the evolution of the microcosm that forms the cornerstone of the Bhagavata Purana, the text that Sankaradeva chooses as his primary source.

Contrary to popular perception, the story of Krsna in the Purana—and in Sankaradeva, as a corollary,—is not one of an ‘epic hero’ or a historical personality of ancient India but, rather, the ‘story’ of the supreme, immanent pure personality (Paramatma) within the microcosm. Krsna is God Himself seen through the prism of the human body. The seer-devotees of the Vedanta have re-visualized the image of the transcendent Brahman as the immanent Lord; as a child, as it were, stealing the product of the senses! Here, one must remark on a very eye-catching feature of the Sankaradeva movement and it is this that there never has been a centrality of an external geographic conception of a Mathura or a Gokula in the lives of its saints and leading personalities. There is thus an intense paramatmic flavor in all of the Sankaradevite literature.

The mind of the Vedantic seer- devotees erupted in joy on seeing this most wondrous microcosm engineered by the Lord and animated by just a tiny part of His infinite spiritual power. And absorbed in the bliss of the Lord's love, they began to translate, or rather, translocate, the topographical entities of the external world into this inner ‘world’. As a result, what we have in the Bhagavata is a microcosmic narrative woven together with the metaphor of the external world. The material evolution of the (theistic) Samkhya philosophy is set within a ontogenic framework. Science—embryology, to be precise,—philosophy and poetics thus come together in one irresistible combination.

As a side-note, Sankaradeva never viewed the texts such as the Puranas and the Mahabharata as historical texts. This is also a tremendous lesson for today’s interpreters. In the Caturbbimsati Avatara section of his Kirttana, Sankaradeva says that as Vyasa saw that the people had become ‘of extremely dull intellect’, he decided to compose the Puranas. This clearly indicates that these are philosophico-scientific texts containing abstruse concepts and scenarios in a ‘storified’ form.

Now, in order to appreciate fully this microcosmic vision of Sankaradeva—its full philosophical import as well as its practical implication—we have also to consider the strategy of personification that is adopted in the Puranic universe of discourse. There seems to be, as soon as we enter the puranic realm, a sudden profusion of personalities—kings and warriors, devas, asuras, mythical creatures, apsarases, rsis, etc. An overwhelming majority of these characters are the personified forms of the various evolutes of primal matter.

At the grossest level, we have the internal organs residing in the cavities of the nether region of the body; these are known as the bhutas or daityas. Diametrically opposite to these in point of nature, in the ‘heavenly’ or cerebral regions, are the subtle neural entities known as the devas. They are the controllers of the sense organs such as the eyes, the ears, etc. which are likened to sages (rsis) as they remain engaged in ‘knowing’ or acquiring sense-data. Creatures such as Garuda and Hanumana represent the vital airs (pranas). Further, we have two very special entities that are represented by the figures of Brahma and Siva. Brahma is the personification of the microcosmic mind while Siva is kala (‘time’). Kala is an agent of differentiation of the material substance (sakti). It is specially connected to the bhutas or the internal organs. Finally, primal matter itself is personified as Laksmi.     

Apart from these basic categories, there exist numerous organic classes and sub-classes such as the glands, muscles, ligaments, sensors and nerves which may also be personified. There is also, as mentioned above, a microcosmic geography:  venous rivers, arterial trees, neuronal forests, cartilaginous mountains, etc. As we can see, the bewildering material variety within the human body lends itself excellently to personification.   

There are sufficient hints in the writings of Sankaradeva and his disciple and successor Madhavadeva regarding these mappings. In his rendering of the 3^rd book of the Bhagavata entitled Anadi Patana (Cosmogenesis), Sankaradeva says that all the signs of the universe are ‘within this very body’. He mentions that the location of all the devas is the body. His rendering also clearly brings out the material nature of the mind and the devas. Similarly, in the verses of the Nama Ghosa (Namanvaya section), Madhavadeva explains that as the Lord has entered into the category of the indriyas, He is referred to as ‘Hrsikesa’ by all exemplar-devotees. Further, he says, ‘by the term go (cow) is meant the sensory receptors’ (go pade beda indriyaka buli). And, as the Lord preserves these, He is known as ‘Gopala’.

To conclude, given this microcosmic background, it is not difficult to understand why Sankaradeva should exhort the jivas to take refuge solely in Krsna. This is because, among all the entities, only Krsna is conscious personality, the others being mere personifications of matter. The jivas too are essentially conscious and spiritual and ontologically superior to matter. Therefore, it behoves them to do pure devotion only to Krsna, shunning all forms of worship that are a mere emulation of the microcosmic material processes.

The ‘Juice of the Great Bhagavata’: Translation of A Few Passages from the Nama Ghosa of Madhavadeva

The Srimad Bhagavata is held, in the Eka-Sarana faith, to be সমস্ত-বেদান্ত-সাৰ, the essence of the entire Vedanta, the crest or the highest culmination of the Vedas. The Bhagavata is the supreme sastra or scripture. It is মহাভাগৱত, the Great Bhagavata. And it is পৰম-আনন্দ-ৰসময়, saturated with the nectar (rasa) of supreme joy. In his Nama Ghosa, Madhavadeva writes:

সমস্ত-বেদান্ত-সাৰ মহাভাগৱত শাস্ত্ৰ
ইহাৰ অমৃত-ৰস পাই |
পৰম সন্তোষে পান কৰিল যিজনে তাৰ
অন্যত্ৰ ৰসত ৰতি নাই ||১৮

Essence of all Vedanta—scripture of the Great Bhagavata;
obtaining its nectarine juice,
the one who has drunk with extreme satisfaction, that one
has no liking for any other juice. [18]

Here, it seems, the Bhagavata is compared to a fruit and the joy obtaining from its discussion to the enjoying of the nectarine drink (rasa) of this fruit. Moreover, rasa has also another meaning in Sanskrit and it is indicative of the feeling or sentiment prevailing in any literary or poetical work. It means also the ‘taste or character of a work’ (Sanskrit Dictionary). Thus, overall, it seems to be the transcendental flavour of bhakti—the feeling of supreme joy—that is being referred to as rasa in this passage.

মহাভাগৱত-ৰস মাধৱৰ নাম-যশ
আক পান কৰিল যিজনে |
কৃষ্ণৰ চৰণে চিত্ত দিয়া মোক্ষ-আদি ৰসে
ৰতি আৰ নকৰয় মনে ||১৯

The juice of the Great Bhagavata—Madhava’s Name and Glory;
one who has drunk of it [once];
offering mind at the Feet of Krsna, in beverages of salvation, etc.,
one never again develops fondness in mind. [19]

In this passage again, the nectar (rasa) of the Bhagavata, consisting [solely] of the Name and Glories (nama-yasa) of Madhava is the supreme juice, extremely tasty and delightful, drinking which a person forsakes all liking for any other juice, apart from it, like that of salvation (moksa) etc. Indeed the taste obtained from these ordinary beverages would be nothing compared to that of the nectar of the Bhagavata.

সকল নিগম কল্পতৰু তাৰ
ফল মহাভাগৱত |
সেহি ফলৰস হৰি-গুণ-যশ
পিয়োক সাধু-সঙ্গত ||৪০৩

All the scriptures of release are the wish-yielding tree.
The fruit of that is the Great Bhagavata.
The juice of this fruit only—the qualities and glories of Hari—
you drink in the company of the devotees. [403]

In this passage, Madhavadeva exhorts us all to have a taste of the excellent juice of the fruit called Bhagavata in the company of ‘fellow drinkers’—the devotees of Hari. Here, the Bhagavata is explicitly referred to as a fruit (phala). All the scriptures of release (nigama) constitute, as it were, a ‘tree of wishes’ (kalpataru) and the Bhagavata is the fruit of this ‘tree of wishes’. The juice of this fruit (phala rasa) consists [solely] of the qualities and glories (guna-yasa) of Hari.

সকলে নিগমে কল্পতৰু তাৰ ফল মহাভাগৱত
শুক-মুখে আসি ভূমিত ভৈলা বিদিত |
ৰসত চতুৰ যিটোজন কৃষ্ণৰ চৰণে দিয়া মন
পৰম সন্তোষে পিয়োক ফল-অমৃত ||৬০৩



All the scriptures of release are the tree of wishes; the fruit of that [tree] is the Great Bhagavata;
touched by the mouth of Suka, it has fallen on earth and become well-known.
All those who are the connoisseurs of rasa, laying one’s mind at the Feet of Krsna,
enjoy the nectar of this fruit with great satisfaction. [603]

Why Laksmi Should Not be Worshiped: On the Worship of prakrti etc. and The Message of Sankaradeva

It is unfortunate that the worship of maya (literally meaning ‘not-that’ or ‘illusion’ in Sanskrit) should have become so widely prevalent in our traditions in the form of pujas (of Laksmi, Durga, etc.).  The term maya is used synonymously with prakrti or material nature (primal matter) because it is the job of material nature to conceal and obscure God (see earlier post).

The puranas are the solidification of some of the abstract and ineffable ideas of the vedanta for the easy grasp of the lay populace. The poet-seers (because they were poet-seers) personified nature and the material agents present within it.

This gives rise, in the puranic literature, to a profusion of stylized ‘personalities’. Matter or prakrti is personified—anthropomorphized, rather— as ‘Laksmi’ and given feminine characteristics (‘प्रकृति’ is feminine gender in Sanskrit)—the wife, as it were, of Visnu. This helps to make a particular point to the lay mind:

Just as it is the faithful wife’s sole objective to serve her husband and lord (svami), so also the only aim of prakrti is to serve the Lord’s purpose.

It is for this reason alone that in the puranic representations, Laksmi is always seen serving the Feet of Visnu. The Supreme Spirit, Parama Purusa, is Lord of primal matter or Laksmi (laksmipati bhagavanta).  In this way, by abstracting material nature as a personality, the poet-seer is able to demonstrate the superiority, nay the supreme status, of Parama Purusa in relation to this lifeless and totally inert entity called prakrti ^[1].

But what is happening today in the realm of eternal (sanatana) religion is worship of the un-eternal! In what must be one of the most horrifying examples of misinterpretation in the entire spiritual history of mankind, this lifeless entity called prakriti, this dead matter which is but a tool in the hands of the Supreme Spirit, is being deified, worshipped through pujas etc. and raised to the status of Supreme Being!  Surely this is the height of extreme absurdity! Surely this is literalism gone haywire!

মায়া আদি কৰি যত সমস্তে জগতে জড়
কৃষ্ণেসে চৈতন্য আত্মা শুদ্ধ |
চৈতন্য কৃষ্ণক এড়ি জড়ক ভজিয়া মৰে
কিনো লোক অধম মুগুধ ||৪৭

Whatever there may be, māyā and the rest all the world are gross.
Only Krsna is the Spirit, the Pure Consciousness.
How bewitched and deluded are the people who leave aside Krsna the Consciousness
And die worshipping the gross.
[Nama-Ghosa, 47]

Anthropomorphism, or personification, is attribution of human form or other characteristics to anything other than a human being. There are several ‘personalities’ of the puranas—Brahma, Siva, etc. All of these may be said to represent the material agents or entities of material nature, each with their own respective powers (saktis), domains etc.  These are not the living beings (purusas or jivas) who, by the way, in their true form, are akin to Parama Purusa rather than to prakriti and who, on account of that fact, may be called personalities in the true sense of the term.

Although there is a multiplicity of such ‘personalities’, God (Isvara) is one. This is the Supreme Personality, lord of all the purusas as well as prakrti and of all entities contained within prakrti. He indeed is Narayana, the supreme cause (parama karana) Who is immanent as Visnu within His creation—the macrocosm—and as Paramatma within the microcosm and finally, as Krsna, the Supreme Teacher (Parama Guru) within the historical world. And therefore, as Madhavadeva rightly points out in the Nama Ghosa, while each of the material ‘personalities’ may pray to Laksmi—material nature personified—and report to ‘her’, Laksmi, in turn, must serve and report only to Visnu:

ব্ৰহ্মা আদি দেৱগণে নিচল সম্পত্তি মনে
লক্ষ্মীক সেৱন্ত তপ কৰি |
লক্ষ্মীও সেৱন্ত যাক হেন মহেশ্বৰ বিষ্ণু
আন কোন দেৱ তাঙ্ক সৰি ||১৭

brahmā ādi devagane nicala sampatti mane
laksmika sevanta tapa kari
laksmio sevanta yāka hena Mahesvara Visnu
āna kona deva tānka sari [17] 

 

All the devas—Brahma et al—wishing wealth, immovable,
serve Laksmi, doing austerities.
He Whom even Laksmi serves, such a Supreme Lord Visnu;
which other deity is equal to Him? [17]

ব্ৰহ্মা মহাদেৱ লক্ষ্মী দেৱী কায়-বাক্যে মনে থিৰ কৰি
পৰম আনন্দে চৰণ সেৱন্ত যাৰ |
সদা জন্ম-জৰা-মৃত্যু-হীন শ্ৰীমন্ত সুন্দৰ গুণনিধি
বিষ্ণুত বিনাই কোন দেৱ আছে আৰ ||৫৮৮

brahmā mahādeva laksmi devi
kāyabākyemane thira kari
parama ānande carana sevanta yāra
sadā janma jadā mrtyuhina srimanta sundara gunanidhi
Visnuta bināi kona deva āche āra [588]

Brahma, Mahadeva (Siva), goddess Laksmi,
resolving firmly in body, mind and speech,
Whose Feet they serve in great happiness.
He Who is eternally devoid of (mutations like) birth, death, old age, etc. and Who is possessor of all opulence, supremely beautiful and reservoir of all fine qualities,
apart from Visnu, which deity is there? [588]

Therefore, even amidst the cacophony of pujas, goddess (read nature) worship, illusion worship, etc., the message of Sankaradeva—exact same as the message of Krsna— rings out loud and clear:

“O all mankind, do worship Hari! Do not worship other entities—‘gods’, ‘goddesses’, etc. Direct your worship to Parama Purusa alone, the Lord of both prakrti and purusa and take sole-refuge (Eka-Sarana) in Him”.

মায়া আদি কৰি সমস্তে অসন্ত
জানিবা জড় নিশ্চয় |
হৰি মাত্ৰ সন্ত চৈতন্য ঈশ্বৰ
পৰম তত্ত্ব নিৰ্ণয় ||২০৫

māyā ādi kari samaste asanta
jānibā jada niscaya
Hari mātra santa caitanya Isvara
parama tattva nirnaya [205]

Starting with nescience (maya), all (material) entities are false;
know them to be lifeless (jada) definitely.
Hari, only, is truth, the conscious (caitanya) Lord—
Supreme Entity (tattva) certainly. [205]


If our objective is to approach God, reclaiming our eternal status as eternal, conscious, joyous personalities in His eternal service, instead of lapsing into death (mrtyu), dissolution and mutation (vikara), then we have to root our intellect in God, not in prakrti or maya. If we worship matter (prakrti), we will become matter-like—unconscious, suffering from mutations, and trapped in death. We will not get the true counsel. If we worship God and do devotion to Him, we attain immortality. We become God-like—which is our essential nature.  In the puranic representations, the attendants (parisadas) of Visnu always look like Visnu!

সত্য অসত্যৰ জড় চৈতন্যৰ

মাজত যিটো প্ৰকাশে |

তাকে বুলি মন সেহি সিটো পাৱে

যিজনে যাক উপাসে ||২০৪

satya asatyara jada caitanyara

mājata yito prakāse

tāke buli mana sehi sito pāve

yijane yāka upāse [204]

Between truth and un-truth, unconsciousness and consciousness,
that which is revealed (situated)
is called mind; whichever entity one worships,
it (the mind) attains to that. [204]

[1] It is the Supreme Purusa Who actuates prakrti or material nature and infuses life, as it were, into ‘her’ to initiate the process of evolution or material creation. This is given in the Bhagavata, 3^rd Canto. Maya or prakrti is only a tool in the hands of Parama Purusa. Therefore, Laksmi is always seen serving the Feet of Visnu.